also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.09.2229 +0100]: > > The alternative is to have the control socket use the D-Bus system, > > meaning only one package is needed, but messages > > would need to pass through the dbus-daemon in order to be recieved. > > Well that wasn't what I understood, but I'm really not a D-Bus expert > at all :) Though it doesn't makes sense to let the D-Bus connector be a > separated component as you then only pull the library which is of a > reasonable size.
This is what I initially wanted, but then figured I'd rather reuse existing code than implement my own control protocol (though it's already done, albeit in somewhat of a weird way... -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "never speak disrespectfully of society. only people who can't get into it do that." -- oscar wilde
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
