On Tuesday 20 November 2007 10:26:39 pm Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 21/11/2007, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > Obviously, a lot of these will be false positives, so I definitely > > won't file mass bugs based on this list without checking the full > > details first. > > Maybe suggesting a lintian check would be a good idea? > > Cheers,
It would be hard to write a check without numerous false positives. Under those circumstances I think they would be classified as "I:" messages, which hardly anybody would see anyway. I suppose it would be possible to write a check for empty /usr/sbin, /usr/bin, /etc, ... in packages != base-files, but that would miss a lot of cases. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
