Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Josh Triplett wrote: [...] >> * No locate should have standard priority as long as findutils >> contains locate. >> * locate should move out of findutils into a separate package. >> * Once that happens, if any locate should have priority standard, >> mlocate should. >> * However, I don't think any locate should have priority standard.
> Agreed to all points, except I do think some locate should probably be > standard priority. But not required or essential. [...] Hello, FYI I think we have got most pieces now: - GNU locate package in experimental (Priority: optional) split-off from findutils, using update-alternatives. The locate package conflicts with slocate (<= 3.1-1.1). The respective changes have also been merged (but not tested) for the next 4.2.x upload. - A patch for dlocate to work with the new (and the old) locate package. #451750 - A patch for slocate to switch from using dpkg-divert to u-a. #451792 cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
