* Joey Hess [Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:47:40 -0500]: > Josh Triplett wrote: > > Thus, I would argue that:
> > * No locate should have standard priority as long as findutils > > contains locate. > > * locate should move out of findutils into a separate package. > > * Once that happens, if any locate should have priority standard, > > mlocate should. > > * However, I don't think any locate should have priority standard. > Agreed to all points, except I do think some locate should probably be > standard priority. But not required or essential. It's easy enough to > skip priority standard stuff if it's not wanted. Okay, thanks. Andreas, how does the idea of splitting locate/updatedb out from findutils sound to you, to follow the above plan? (dlocate can Depend: on locate | findutils (<= 4.3.8-X) then.) Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org I try to keep an open mind, but not so open that my brains fall out. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
