Hi Dne Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:51:12 +0200 Philipp Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> I'd assume it's not so much the binary size of the packages, but the number
> of
> them ... that's why I asked whether a new branch might be better for them.
> Like "stable", "testing", "unstable", "experimental" ... "dbginfo". Then
> normal users wouldn't even see this packages.
It is the size of packages what matters. In most cases debug symbols
in -dbg packages much larger than stripped package itself. Just random
package that I maintain:
$ apt-cache show libgammu2 libgammu2-dbg | egrep 'Package:|^Size:'
Package: libgammu2
Size: 423010
Package: libgammu2-dbg
Size: 972178
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
