Hi, On Mon, 01 Oct 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 03:47:34PM +0000, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > You type a binary package name and you get to see whether you'll > > be able to use a single symbols files for all arches like > > simple libs, for example ftplib3: > > http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols?pkgname=ftplib3 > > > > Or if you're a complicated lib like libc6, you'll have to handle > > different files for each architecture: > > http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols?pkgname=libc6 > > Is there some statics on how many packages have per arch files ? > (Maybe excluding the hurd case if possible, as it seems to be a specific > to hurd issue).
I posted some in the previous thread on this topic: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/08/msg00915.html | Among 2195 packages with shlibs files, 1347 have the same symbols file | across all architectures, and on the 848 packages where we have | differences, 354 of them have differing versions in various architectures | in unstable (so the difference might be unrelated to the architecture, but | simply because the code base differs). That still lives 494 packages which | are in sync in unstable and who have different set of symbols on different | architectures. Many of them are C++ packages but not all. This analysis was done without counting hurd-i386 (which was simply forgotten in my list of arches...) but included m68k. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
