22-09-2007, Steinar H. Gunderson: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:44:04AM +1245, Andreas Fleckl wrote: >> It features the smallest possible size and memory requirements, the fastest >> speed, and offers fairly good functionality. > > Size and memory aside, I sort of doubt asmutils' sort is faster than > coreutils' sort just because it's written in assembly. > > /* Steinar */
I second this. Also. Those programmers are inventing wheels again, fsck. Why they don't want to make (at least) C (at least gcc or tcc) compiler more efficient: fast but with good optimization? And this is not saying about portability of that userspace tools (see klibc), usability, maintenance. Sigh. ____ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
