On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 2007/9/12, John Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > An obsession with "freedom" that insists on removing RFCs from source > > tarballs, is absurd. Why not change the contract. > > You're not talking seriously, are you?
Why not? Is it difficult to acknowledge that not all people think the same? Have you noticed that none of the GR end up with 100% on one side and 0% on the other? I also argued (on IRC) about the fact that removing some non-free parts of upstream source tarballs (like RFC) is not really worth it if we make sure that it doesn't end up in binary packages. I think it's a perfectly valid opinion but I know that it's not the predominant opinion within Debian. Given that I'm not affected by such a case and given that others are happy with the status-quo, I don't see the point to start a discussion about this. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
