Am Montag, den 13.08.2007, 22:26 +0200 schrieb Julian Andres Klode: > Am Montag, den 13.08.2007, 15:50 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess: > > > Policy is actually careful to set up the invarient that "-" anywhere in > > a version number means the package is not native. I don't know why the > > developers reference choses to ignore that. Is there something wrong > > with using a version number like "1.0.0.1" for native package NMUs? > > (Being careful to choose one that is well outside the normal range. > > "1.0.debian.1" if necessary.) > > > I suggest to use <Ver>nmu<NMU>, like 1.0nmu1. > > Some people use version like "1.0.0.1" for NMUs of binary packages. s/binary/native -- Julian Andres Klode
IRC Nickname: juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode, GimpNet) Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049) Debian Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode Ubuntu Wiki: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode In Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~juliank My packages: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Languages: German, English, [bit French]
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
