Quoting Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, we should use the liberation fonts, which are designed to replace > > > the MS fonts. > > > > Have their licensing issues been solved? > > Which ones ?
Restrictions of modification, IIRC. See -legal a few weeks ago. I was asked to sponsor an upload of ttf-liberation but, after reading the fonts license, I asked the maintainer to take -legal advice.....and, IIRC, the conclusion was that soem restrictions pu tin the license were not making the font entirely DFSG-compliant.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
