Luca Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One of the biggest problems we experienced is that the existing > documentation, albeit useful and rather rich, is not coherent. I > think we need something more homogeneous, backed by an overall > design. This would not be yet-another-document to read, instead > would substitute many other small (often out-of-date or > contradictory) documents about major and minor topics.
This sounds interesting. Can you start by enumerating some of the existing documents that you feel would be obsoleted by this proposed document? -- \ "Holy bouncing boiler-plated fits, Batman!" -- Robin | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
