David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, if foo depends on foo-data, and foo-data depends on foo, I find > it really hard to see the point of splitting the two into distinctive > packages...
It could be useful if foo-data is very large, but changes rarely, whereas foo is small, but changes more often. Then if the user updates frequently, he will usually only have to download a new foo, not foo-data. -Miles -- Ich bin ein Virus. Mach' mit und kopiere mich in Deine .signature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
