On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:33:45PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >> Hello everybody, > >> > >> here are some news about the latest changes made to the Package Tracking > >> System. > >> > >> New derivatives keyword > >> ----------------------- > >> > >> The PTS will be used to relay informations from derivative distributions. > >> Therefore, a new keyword "derivatives" has been implemented. By default, > >a > >> PTS subscriber won't receive the messages associated to this keyword > >> unless he has already manually activated the "cvs" keyword (i.e. the set > >> of users having the "derivatives" keyword has been initialized as the > >set of > >> users having the "cvs" keyword because those people can read patches and > >> are most probably interested in them). > > > >So by default it is assumed that I should make Ubuntu's work and dig > >into these patches to see if some pieces should be applied into Debian? > >No thanks, I am getting tired of all those Debian developers who are > >more interested in improving Ubuntu than Debian, and just added the > >following rules to my .procmailrc: > >[...] > > No, this is just a service. If you want to dig into these patches, you > need to subscribe, otherwise you can live without them like you did > until now, didn't you?
No, I have to unsubscribe, this is exactly what upsets me. There are also cases where messages will be sent to lists, like http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2006/07/msg00021.html So my procmail rule is the best option. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
