* Humberto Massa Guimarães ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > We're losing sight of the key issue here. We *cannot* use their > > trademark under their current trademark policy. They are offering us a > > deal that is Debian specific to allow use to use the marks. Can we > > accept such a deal as a project? Does the DFSG allow us to? > > Well said. IMHO, no. DFSG #8 -- witch is part of the SC, IIRC -- > forbids us to have rights that our users don't have.
This is indeed my feeling as well. But I'm willing to be convinced that my interpretation is incorrect. BTW, any Ubuntu developers care to comment? I'm interested in second opinions and how you guys are handling this situation? Did you accept an arrangement with MoFo? -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
