On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:18:47AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:12:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:47:12AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > 2.4.x kernels are already obsolete by now except that for some doorstop > > > architectures, I do not know about any other modern distribution which > > > still installs one. > > > Since (at least) potato, Debian has always supported more than one major > > line of kernels. I don't see why we suddenly would need to change that > > now. > > We've done this out of necessity -- *not* because it's a good idea.
Obviously. What I meant is, we shouldn't throw out "doorstop architectures" (sic) because they still want 2.4. At least not with the current state of affairs; by the time etch releases, I might have changed my opinion on that subject. The situation is different for 2.2; I don't want to see 2.2 in etch as much as anyone else. -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
