Petter Reinholdtsen writes: > [Matthias Klose] > > Pere, could you point of one of these packages? > > Which one? One of the packages changing name from libfoo to > libfooc102 and then if this proposal goes through back to libfoo? Or > one of the packages outside of debian installed on some machine > somewhere? > > PS: No, I haven't checked if either of these package sets are > non-empty. The first class of packages should be fairly easy to find, > as we still have the package lists from woody and sarge available. > The first class of packages is impossible to extract. :)
As Steve did explain, the first class is a non-issue. Because you brought up the topic, I was asking you for a real-world example of your so defined second set. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
