On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:28:08PM -0400, sean finney wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:05:26PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > One way around this would be for all of the maintainers of packages > > depending on apt to agree to a significant version number increment when > > moving to apt 0.6; then such versions could remain in experimental without > > being removed. > > or, since we're now officially in the sarge freeze(!) we could just put > it into sid and not worry about the dependency issue, right? > > i've been using apt .6 on one of my machines, and while i haven't kept > a super-close eye on it, i haven't noticed anything that would make > me think it an unsuitable candidate for unstable.
I was just talking with Colin Watson on IRC about that very idea; he says that library packages should still be handled carefully in unstable for now. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
