On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:47:41AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) wrote:
> > >Apparently the feeling wrt distcc is somewhat different and is likely to
> > >be a more generally accepted solution to the slow-at-compiling issue.
> >
> > I like distcc -- heck I went to high school with the author -- and I
> > think it's cool. I don't know that it'd be enough to get ports like m68k
> > working quickly enough to meet the 1 or 2 buildds requirement, and it
> > doesn't solve the other issues that arise at all. But hey, I wouldn't
> > have a problem with an m68k+distcc/i386 pairing as a buildd, if all the
> > other requirements were also being dealt with properly. That's also more
> > a DSA/buildd issue though, neither of which are hats of mine.
>
> Alright, perhaps I misunderstood the responsibilities a bit. buildds
> are run by DSA
No. There's some overlap between the groups of 'buildd admins' and
'DSA', but they are by far not the same.
> (Which I'm guessing is the 'System Administration' group
> on w.d.o/intro/organization)?
Yes.
> Is access to wanna-build also managed by that group?
Access to wanna-build is managed by James Troup and Ryan Murray.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
