Sven Luther wrote: > After reading the mention of it in debian-weekly-news, i read with interest : > > > http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/random_idea_re_new_queue-2005-03-02-21-12.html > > And i am not sure to get the hang of it. > > You mention that not all packages will be able to do go to this new.debian.org > archive, but that not-really-new packages are good candidates. How would one > decide, is it the maintainer doing the upload who takes the decision ?
Yes of course, the same as a maintainer makes that decision before putting a NEW package up on people.d.o right now. > will there be an automated check during initial queue processing (for new > binary > packages for a same source package for example, or wildcarded packages for > soname changes or kernels) ? As far as the idea goes, I guess DD's who care about speeding that up could automate or semi-automate their advocations for such packages in the new queue. (If they weren't throttled.) > Also, i don't understand what you get more this way, apart from added > bureaucrazy, over simply accepting not-really-new packages out-of hand My idea is not particularly targeted at that, it was more trying to see how we could decentralise the whole new queue processing issue. I don't really understand the benefits of requring NEW processing for binaries, so I'm not going to try to second-guess the ftp-masters on it. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
