* Brian Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I agree. It's become quite evident that Debian is barely able to make > releases at all with the status quo. And, given a choice between having > no stable releases at all and having stable releases of a significantly > reduced number of arches, I'd gladly choose the latter. > > What baffles me is why so many seem to miss this point and instead have > decided to turn it into a religious flame war.
I'm not sure that we've entirely missed the point as much as we like to
think there's a better solution than dropping all but 4 archs. We're
then frustrated that instead of being given reasons for the change we
were given rules. It's difficult to come up with a solution to a rule.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
