Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the ldif format was not a problem? was the syntax parsed > correctly from 2.1 to 2.2?
LDIF is rfc described... there shouldn't be any issue using the LDIF output. The main issue is possibly stripping the entryCSN for the use of syncrepl. However, syncrepl was poorly implemented in OpenLDAP 2.2, and i would advise against its use. OpenLDAP 2.3 has a completely rewritten syncrepl implementation that is stable. However, OpenLDAP 2.3 is still in the beta stages. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Developer ITSS/Shared Services Stanford University GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
