On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:27:50PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > especially given the requirement that you need <= 2 buildds. > > I consider that requirement to be not warranted, and indeed unjustified. > > If I had to think of a rationale for it, the only one I could think of > would be "the architecture needs to be fast enough not to block security > updates". > > However, I consider an update whose $ARCH binaries are released a week > later not to be a problem.
I think a lot of users would consider it a problem. Imagine, would you be happy with a highly visible public announcement of every vulnerability against your servers, a week before you got the fix? - Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
