On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:10:23PM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > >>incremental building supported? And finally, why isn't it considered a > >>technical solution? > >> > >> > > > >Because it is not needed for the fast tier1 arches ? > > > > > This is a chicken-and-egg thing, isn't it? And it should be considered a > *technical* solution, even if not a *political* one.
Ok, let me be blunt about this. It is a political problem, the dpkg/buildd/ftp-master admin have not the will to implement such a solution, and thus block any attempt to implement this kind of problem. We would need at least a dpkg and build tool upgrade for this to happen, and the developer of those are the ones in the let's drop all arches camp. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
