-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You'll figure out that the timing for this new policy is absolutely >> perfect; we're a week away from the voting period for the new DPL >> term. The current DPL can't (and won't, obviously) do anything about >> it, and the candidates signed the proposal. > > I haven't signed the proposal. I'm undecided on the technical side of Sorry, I simplified the statement a bit. > things (I'd rather see a list of the problems that are being solved, and > a description of how these proposals fix those problems), and I think > the way the meeting and conclusions were announced was fairly > disasterous. That's the very least we can say about it, yes. >> I should add that the >> Vancouver meeting was announced at the very last minute, too. And I'm >> wondering, who paid for the travel expenses ? Did the people involved >> pay out of their own pocket ? Did the Project pay ? Did somebody else >> pay the bill ? > > As mentioned in > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/03/msg00015.html , the > funding came from NUUGF. As far as I know, the project spent no money on > this. For once, it was actually documented. I read the announcement quickly when I received it, and didn't remember that bit. Thanks for pointing out. JB. - -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFCNfIlzWFP1/XWUWkRAlGUAJ9Onrpiaf+7z7kcG1lzhp3A0Ed+GwCgjKeC PsUAJk/QQLZyOnytjPMnpto= =MGgW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
