This one time, at band camp, Ingo Juergensmann said: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:47:58PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > > > Moreover, the criterias given in your mail are just so oriented > > towards/against some architectures, that it's a bad joke (I was going > > to write "disgusting", really). > > It's a total change of direction: from "as long as there are people who > care, we will release those arch" to "no matter if there are people who > care, we just release mainstream archs". :-(
No, I thought the proposal stated quite clearly, if there are users and there are porters, a given arch is able to be included. All that means is that those interested will actually have to do some of the work to support things like security and the kernel. I know many of you already do quite good work as porters, and I mean no offense. But I can see quite clearly that it would be difficult for the security team or other groups to keep up with things growing the way they are. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
pgp3t9eVqTBTp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
