Am 21.06.97 schrieb edd # rosebud.sps.queensu.ca ... Moin Dirk!
DE> But they get html via the dwww package! Which gives them _more_ DE> documentation then there is in html only. But this requires a www server! Not a good idea for slow systems like my notebook. And the result doesn't look great. DE> Seconded. Nobody answered my mail from yesterday which showed that the DE> doc-linux package will take up over 5 MB (instead of 1.6 MB) for the html DE> stuff. You could compress the HTML pages. But this is maybe a problem for some browsers. DE> No way. IMHO, we should add a Policy Guideline stating that html should be DE> in a seperate package [1] and that info should be shipped as usual. I for No. Then we should info and html in seperate packages. And the policy says that HTML should be the Debian documentation format. cu, Marco -- Uni: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fido: 2:240/5202.15 Mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/ -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
