I dont know if I already said this but exim does not support bangpaths but domainized uucp is no problem.
On 14 Jun 1997, John Goerzen wrote: >Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> >> It might be good if we would replace smail in hamm with exim. Exim should >> be the standard mailer for hamm: > >Exim doesn't provide UUCP capabilities *at all*, thus it is rather >useless for sites that use UUCP (like me). Right now, I am using >sendmail. (What, BTW, is the reason for not using sendmail?) > >-- >John Goerzen | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org) >Custom Programming | >[EMAIL PROTECTED] | > > --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
