Dale Scheetz wrote: >Two packages in the list of "important" refused to install because they >declared (correctly) their dependence upon packages of lower priority. > > at depends on libelf0 priority: optional
This dependency isn't needed... hmm... For some reason, the configure script created by autoconf always looks for -lelf and, if it can find it, adds it to the list of searched libraries. First, why does my autoconf - generated configure search for -lelf and then always adds it? IMHO, this is a bug in autoconf; I never asked it to do that. Second, this is a bug in at; I'll uninstall the libelf binary from the system I compile at on, so this doesn't happen again. That will be fixed in the next release, although it's far from being a critical bug :-) >This tells me that libelf0 and libg++27 should have their priority field >changed to "important". In principle, you're right :-) -- Thomas Koenig, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] The joy of engineering is to find a straight line on a double logarithmic diagram. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
