On Jun 12, Kai Henningsen wrote
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philippe Troin) wrote on 12.06.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'm stuck with the diald package, and I've got problems with users
> > from old versions. The thing is:
> > the files /etc/diald/diald.ip-{up,down} weren't conffiles, and now
> > they are.
> > Installing a new version of diald where the ip-up/down scripts are
> > conffiles on top of an old version where they weren't results in
> > overwriting of the files.
>
> I'd like to call that a dpkg bug. When a file is a conffile in either the
> new or the old package, dpkg ought to use conffile behaviour. Anything
> else is just too dangerous.
> I don't know about the "conffile only in older package" situation, but it seems like a good idea for the "conffile only in newer package" situation. Christian
pgp6KxGJmcLdI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
