On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:12:35PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 09:34:20PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I think it might be a good thing if you orphan this package before you > > ask for removal, especially as you (and we all) know that GFDL-docu is > > allowed in the upcoming release of sarge. > > GR 2004-004 puts the new SC on hold since implementing it in full would > delay the release of Sarge for too long. All GFDL documentation must > eventually either be relicensed, rewritten or removed.
... or a new DFSG-free version of the GFDL must be released, for which the optimists among us may still hope. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
