On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:06:18 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:30:24PM -0200, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:12:21PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> >
>> > Am 2004-12-01 13:16:11, schrieb Fernanda Giroleti Weiden:
>> > >
>> > > First of all, it's a sexist package, sure. Putting a program on
>> > > Debian in which you have pictures of nude women is VERY
>> > > agressive to the most women. Yes, it's agressive to me.
>> >
>> > And I was thinking, I am alone...
>>
>> It's VERY oppressive to force hot-babe out of Debian because of
>> personal feelings about nudity. It's pure anti-speech insanity
>> leading the way to socialism.
> How about we leave it out because it's crap, then?
From all accounts, it seems to be a well done piece of
software -- just its choice of images is an issue.
> Why stop at cartoons? Once it's themable, we should ship some
> photographs too. And don't worry about the load monitoring, let's
> just ship some porn for the sake of it. Call it test data for
> pornview or something.
Hmm. I would like some Raphael budes, yes. and some studies by
michelangelo too. Oh, you think that is not porn?
manoj
--
If at first you don't succeed that is only to be expected--there is a
little bit of good even in the best of us. (No one is as good as he
thinks he is.)
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
