On Nov 10, Jamie Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current version of the netbase package corrected bug #275244 by > adding the entry "ypxfrd 600100069" to /etc/rpc. > > I however already had an entry for ypxfrd in my /etc/rpc, "ypxfrd > 100069". The addtion of this alternate name violates the unique name policy I > thought the lookup tables used. I noticed this when I was updating my LDAP > with the alterations and found that I could only have one port number for > each service name, leading me to reason this is invalid.
I noticed this, but I have no clue about which one is correct. I'm waiting for more information. -- ciao, | Marco | [9114 re8uEw2n5qyC6]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
