Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 02:48:01PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: >>> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> > When we used to freeze unstable before a release, one of the problems >>> > was that many updates were blocked by that, and once the freeze was >>> > over, unstable tended to become _very_ unstable, and took months to get >>> > back into shape. >>> >>> What do you think we'd get by combining both (testing + unstable freeze)? >> >> My guess is that the release team would go insane having to approve >> every upload to unstable. > > I don't think so. Dinstall would reject any new upstream release. > Approvals would only apply to t-p-u just like it is done > currently.
Oh, it would be easy for me to break the tetex-packages (and cause lots of FTBFS bugs) just by applying all the great ideas about improved packaging that I have in mind. No upstream version needed for that. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
