On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Canonical work because they consist of a small set of people that work > > together and who don't let egos get in the way. They work because they > > have a strong leader who provides firm direction. They work because they > > don't have the flaws Debian has - lack of communication, excessive > > self-importance and no strong feeling of what the fuck we're actually > > supposed to be doing. I don't see your solution or your method solving > > any of these issues. Building consensus helps with all of them. Consider > > investing your efforts in that, rather than refusing to discuss your > > opinions. > > Are you saying that technical choices do not contribute to the success > of Canonical? For instance, deciding to target the distribution at > most popular architectures only?
In my experience as both a Canonical employee and a Debian developer, the number of architectures supported by Ubuntu makes a negligible difference to Ubuntu's ability to release. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
