On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:12:29AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > > > Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we > > > can investigate? master's e-mail doesn't appear to be generally broken. > > > I wonder, though, if all five (!) MXs are doing the right thing. > > > > I've had at least 5 BTS mails bounced back to me, and master continues > > to reject with '451 rejected: temporarily unable to verify sender > > address'. > > > > I suspect that this message will never reach [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I haven't noticed it bouncing but it has yet to process the bug email I > mentioned in my other post. Also, I have not heard back from anyone as > to why that might have happened.
Clint's problem turned out to be due to an unreadable home directory on master. Your case is different: it appears that the mail you reported (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) was erroneously caught by our spam filters. I've reinjected it by hand and the bugs are now closed. Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 4.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 4.3 SORTED_RECIPS Recipient list is sorted by address Note that this has nothing to do with the recent compromise. I've dropped the SORTED_RECIPS score to 3.8 to try to reduce false positives here; I hope that doesn't result in too much more mass spam. > Add to that the fact that the developer.php summary page is still > fubar, I think I'll take a vacation from Debian until things are back > to normal. I think things are fairly normal right now to be honest, but if you do take a vacation at least please make sure somebody uploads kdebase. :) I guess one of the QA group will have a look at developer.php soon. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
