-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 13:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> > On 2003-12-05 11:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > their fine work. I really love what they do and SkoleLinux is one of
> > > the most impressive derivatives of Debian, but it just does not (yet)
> > > fall under our definition.]
> >
> > huh ?! How do you figure that?
>
> Please read again my last two mails and assume that I know what SkoleLinux
> is.
I wasn't making that assumption (sorry if it seemed I was), I was pointing
out some of the details of Skolelinux (which I did assume you aren't
completely familiar with), in the hope of pinpointing the exact point on
which we disagree (as I obviously do think of Skolelinux as a CDD).
So given those details what makes you say Skolelinux isn't a CDD?
(I'm guessing "not everything used in Skolelinux is in Debian" _yet_)
- --
Cheers, cobaco
1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB)
2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double
format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/0O6U5ihPJ4ZiSrsRAuZOAJ92sLAWZoPUXzONb+xylPhryi8pSgCgjC/G
akaUiZZr+przqw08Eqrjeo0=
=lWSe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
