On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:54:22PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > Nov 28 22:39 Linux 2.4.23 released > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Bernd is correct, though - if the machines had been running 2.4.23, they > wouldn't have been vulnerable. The fact that it was impossible to do so > doesn't enter into the equation when you're working from blind assertions. > <g>
Hehe, well I am sorry. I had the impression 2.4.23 was older. Should have checked my facts. BTW: I do have checked the kernel version of the major distros, all ship newer kernels than debian (if you look at the upstream version). However I do not know how reliable dostrowatch is, for comparision. Greetings Bernd -- (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.de,debian.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/ o--o *plush* 2048/93600EFD [EMAIL PROTECTED] +497257930613 BE5-RIPE (O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
