On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 05:17, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:51:43 -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > If the sub-project approach would mean that the new packages and > > enhancements would be folded into Debian, then I think that is definitely > > preferable. I do not think that basing it on testing is the best approach; > > in my experience, enterprises prefer a longer (stable) release cycle than > > testing's daily churn. > > Normally I'd agree; however, one of the issues I'm trying to resolve is > the need for numerous backports. However, I do believe the > subproject/kernel is a good start. I would prefer to see it based around > testing snapshots, not necessarily testing itself.
Is it possible to create task or meta packages that depend on specific versions - eg. a bunch of versions as at a specific "snapshot" date of "testing"?? ta zen
