also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.11.12.2312 +0100]: > I'd always understood that bugs with a severity of 'serious' or > above (also knows as Release Critical, or RC bugs) should always > be treated with the highest priority, not just when near > a release.
also sprach Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.11.12.2343 +0100]: > Er, I think any RC bug in a package should be fixed ASAP, > regardless of the release schedule. also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.11.13.0030 +0100]: > If you take the latter approach, the packages in question will > have to be either NMUed or removed from sarge. The more people who > say "oh, we've got plenty of time so I don't need to fix this bug > right now", the harder it is to produce a release. I get your point, and I will tend to the RC bug as soon as somehow possible. Right now I am swamped, and I simply wanted to get a feel whether I am already in the crowd of those upholding the release, or whether I am just another developer that currently has more important things to do than tend to Debian. Unfortunately, I do still have a life outside Debian (and a need for income, and the like). ;^> This may soon change, however... -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
pgpU14jWxZ1dh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
