Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the >> opinion of others developpers ] >> >> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split >> > into two. There's no need to separate the 2k .el file into a separate >> > package. If depending on emacs bothers you, make it a suggests. >> >> Yes, the packages is small *but* IMHO this should be splited in two >> since the -el package can but not used. Other issue is the last >> depends of emacsen and someone can doesn't like have an emacsen >> installed in machine. >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 otavio otavio 4.1K Oct 4 16:58 >> search-citeseer-el_0.1-1_all.deb > > Are you byte-compiling this elisp? > > AFAIK, you need to depend on emacs itself (and not emacs-common) if you > byte-compile it. I _think_ stuff can break if you don't, but I'm vague > on why. Search the debian-emacsen archives. I split off a package > because of that issue a while back, but the seperate -el package is 62KB.
Yes. I'm byte-compiling this. > If the above is correct, then you may bundle your .el file with the main > package without depending on Emacs providing that you don't bye-compile > it. If it's 4K, it's presumably a very small elisp file anyway. Yes, is small but I've tried to do the most right package project (but a bad decision cause the size of files). -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio ---------------------------------------------