John Hasler wrote: > Joel Baker writes: > > If adding .1 to your SA score for lacking a repudiation protocol, and > > 3 (or 5, or whatever) for claiming to be from a domain that denies > > that it origionates mail to the rest of the world from your IP... > > I have no IP. Outgoing mail from home goes via my ISP's smarthost. > Incoming mail goes to his POP server.
Consider your ISP's smarthost's IP address "your IP". It makes no difference. > > If lacking a domain-authorized relay point comes to eventually have > > the same statistics, you'd better bet that you'll have the same sorts > > of penalties in spamfilters. > > What do you mean by "a domain-authorized relay point"? It was my > understanding that the idea behind SPF was that I would list in the DNS > for my domain the IPs that were authorized to send mail claiming to > be from my domain. That would be fine with me, but I evidently > misunderstood. No, you understood it correctly. That's exactly the point.
