On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:56, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:02:09AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > Also the Driscoll is very annoying by using a false email address so it > > can't be replied to. > > As far as I'm concerned, mail that can't be replied to *is* spam.
Fair enough. Ava Driscoll is a spammer then. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
