On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:38:12PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > > apache-perl (apache, apache-perl) > > libapache-mod-perl (apache, libapache-mod-perl) > > wearing my apache maintainer hat, apache-perl needs libapache-mod-perl to > build and vice versa... shipping them togheter solves a lot of troubles..
If I got this correct: Why do you need to have apache-perl getting built by both the apache and apache-perl source code? If it is meant to be getting built by the apache source code, then there is no need for the apache-perl source package? If is is meant to be getting built by the apache-perl source code, then there is no need to build it again in the apache source package? I am not sure if this breaks anything in policy, it would just seem kind of weird having two source packages where only one would seem to be appropriate. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
