On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:25:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 07:45:26AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > > > In order to ease some of the pressure on unstable, we're encouraging > > > greater usage of experimental. [...] > > I'm a maintainer of Debian wl/wl-beta packages (Wanderlust: > > mail/news reader for Emacsen). > > > > Debian wl package provides the upstream stable version (latest > > version is 2.10.1-2). Debian wl-beta package provides the > > upstream CVS snapshot which reaches Debian release-quality > > (latest version is 2.11.7+0.20030814-1). > > > > I intended to include both wl and wl-beta in Debian unstable/ > > testing/stable. > > Why? If wl-beta is Debian release-quality, why would anyone want to > use wl? Are you doing this for the benefit of users, or because you're > worried you might be guessing wrong, or because it's what upstream > prefers, or what?
Hah, and Mark Howard wants to remove galeon 1.3 from unstable since it is only a cvs snapshot because of what you said. I think maybe you want to clarify a bit more the experimental use and cvs snapshot thingy. Friendly, Sven Luther
