On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:13:03PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > no. that's wrong for 2.4+ kernels.
>
> Interesting, as it seems to be the status quo; I have a bunch of
> modules in /lib/modules/2.4.21/misc (from four different modules
> packages produced via make-kpkg), which incidentally all seem to load
> fine.
They will of course still load fine, but one of the reasons for
the module directory layout change is that each package gets its
own directory under /lib/modules/${kver}/
> No need to Cc me, BTW.
Then setup your headers properly..
