Josef Spillner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That being said, the cyclic mentioning of non-openness problems on d-d does
> not invalidate the fact that those who invest time into a project are
> steering it, independent of whether they're a "member" or not (true also for
> KDE and certainly other projects).
And here is another important reason to become DD:
To steer the project.
Policy changes, voting and the internal discussions all need
membership. Having NMs hang in limbo without due cause is denying them
the right to those.
MfG
Goswin
