On 06 Aug 2003 16:48:18 -0500 Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let them go. IMO it's far better to install more than is necessary, but > always get the desired functionality, than install less than is desired, > and then have to spend 20 hours recompiling for the necessary > functionality.
ExxxxCUSE me? Care to explain how this has any relevance at all?
gcc-2.95 is going to somehow break without a SYMLINK to 3.3? It's going to
require a RECOMPILE because a SYMLINK TO A COMPLETELY UNRELATED VERSION ISN'T
PRESENT!?
Do you have any idea how idiotic that sounds? "Yes, you're going to spend
20 hours recompiling for the require functionality because... well... a
symlink was missing that would have forced another unrelated package to be
installed."
Sorry. I've spend time trying to get it to do what I want and amazingly
enough, once there, I had the functionality I wanted.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
| -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
pgpBbM89C1hRj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
