Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In my situation ftp.masters once rejected a package because of licensing > issues (which was ok), but then i reuploaded the package and the rejected it > because of a missing (unneeded) configure option to exclude ssl. I think the
I don't know the specifics of this case but perhaps they were worried about the possibility of pulling ssl into a GPLed program accidentally? If that's the case then it's certainly a valid reason to reject the package. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
