On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:44:57PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 09:45:41PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > > > Why not indeed traft a DFDG spec that includes licenses such as the GFDL > > and IETF's and W3C's licenses, as someone suggested, and add a separate > > 'Documentation' section? > > Because that has been already drafted. Not only I suggested it, I pointed > people to http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ddp-policy/ch-common.en.html. > That section of the DDPolicy describes which are the accepted licenses for > documentation and points to some discussions about the subject in > debian-legal.
This claims the GNU FDL is acceptable, so it's worse than useless. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing, `. `' | Imperial College, `- -><- | London, UK
pgpCWbII1BjXf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
