On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 14:47, Ralf Treinen wrote: > I remember vaguely that there used to be a licence problem with > Moscow ML. What is its exact licence now?
Under the mosml/copyright directory, there are three license files: 1. gpl2 - which is exactly a copy of GPL v2 2. copyright.att - which covers part of the library come from SML/NJ, and as I read it, it's mostly BSDish 3. copyright.cl - covers code come from CAML Light, which looks a little bit strange, but to my unexperienced eyes, looks like a homebrew GPL Anyway, I think it's generally acceptable to put it in Debian main. What's you opinion? -- ZHAO Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/zhaoway/ Linux & Free Software Consultant, Nanjing, China
